Accelerated Learning Table of Contents


 

 

JALT Citations, Full Text, Linked -
The first two reports are available for downloading; the others are available on ERIC Clearinghouse



Copyright 1980-2007 © by Janis L. Erland. The intent of this research report is for educational purposes only and can not be used for any type of commercial or entertainment activity. Research information may be used for personal individual research, but not in any organizational setting without permission of the author. No part of this text or content may be made available or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system.



Adobe Acrobat Reader Adobe at no charge.


 

Abstract and Overview: Five Generations, 27-Years of Iterative Brain-Based Accelerated Learning Experimentation Demonstrate Cognitive Skill Improvement Enhances Academic Achievement and Career Goals. A book in publication process. 2008.

Final conclusions discussing five generations of previously published research, including seven experiments; six published for ages 9-55. Included are four 1-3 year longitudinal studies within four 24-hour daily time frames: 10-Day, 15-Day, 16-Weeks, and 8-Weeks. Other nationally standardized cognitive skills pre- to post-test data is reviewed on groups of business adults and college graduate students at six national test sites.

Brain-Based Accelerated Learning Longitudinal Study Reveals Subsequent High Academic Achievement Gain For Low Achieving, Low Cognitive Skill Fourth Grade Students, Fall 2000

2000 Report of an Intra-Analyses of Two 4th Grade Classrooms with Low Auditory Memory (n=40/44). The classrooms included nine very low "outliers" which skewed the nationally standardized test scores downward as much as 50%. Yet, including these "Outliers," two years longitudinally, performance for these low performing students was now +2 to + 3 1/2 years above grade level in all sixteen subtests on The Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS). Tables reveal at what point in time each of the slow learners accelerated. 46 pages including bibliography. ERIC Clearinghouse: ED 453-553


Brain-Based Accelerated Learning and Cognitive Skills Training Using Interactive Media Expedites High Academic Achievement, Fall 1999

Jan Kuyper Erland 100-page Monograph Scientific Report on Intelligences and Accelerated Learning Applications Documenting The Bridge To Achievement ® Academic Success with Eleven Experimental Classrooms and Three Control Groups in All ITBS Subject Areas. Comparative Literature Review of Intelligences with a Comprehensive Reference List. Is a comprehensive compilation and review of the following two reports. ERIC Clearinghouse: ED 437-650


Brain-Based Learning Longitudinal Study Reveals Solid Academic Achievement Maintenance With Accelerated Learning Practice, Volume 24, 1&2, Spring 1999

1996-1999 Follow-Up Longitudinal Maintenance Report of Above Field Test on Intelligences Theories and Accelerated Learning Academic Achievement Success. ERIC Clearinghouse: ED 436-962

Cognitive Skills and Accelerated Learning Memory Training Using Interactive Media Improves Academic Performance in Reading and Math, Volume 23, 3&4, Fall, 1998

1996-1999 14-Classrooms, (incl. 3 Control Groups), Grades 4-8 Field Test Report on Intelligences Theories and Accelerated Learning Gains in All Subject Areas, Particularly in Reading and Math. ERIC Clearinghouse: ED 436-961


Other Earlier Articles and Research Reports by Jan:

  1. Cognitive Skills Training Improves Listening and Visual Memory for Academic and Career Success. Spring, 1995, 20 (1) 87-101. ERIC Clearinghouse ED 353-286

  2. 1995 - A Short Comparative Review of Three Available Cognitive Skills Programs (Meeker's Bridges-Structure of Intellect, and Feuerstein's Instructional Enrichment/Mediated Learning), with Mem-ExSpan's The Bridge To Achievement. Classroom instruction is reviewed. 7 pages.

  3. Video-Tape Instruction Creates Listening and Visual Memory Integration for Higher Reading and Math Scores. Fall, 1994, 19 (3)155-227. ERIC Clearinghouse ED 437-621; FLO 381-619

  4. 1986-1989 Study and High Reading and Math Academic Achievement Test Results of a Fifth Grade Classroom. This study determined the effects of video-taped instruction in teaching analysis and pattern finding skills. Methodology included guidelines form Cognitive Behavior Modification, Accelerated Learning, and Guilford's Structure of Intellect Model (SOI) within the Right-Brain - Left-Brain Kaufman and Kaufman's Sequential vs. Simultaneous Dichotomy. An Intra-Analyses was conducted to compare the results of the Experimental Special Needs students with the Control group. The Experimental Special Needs students surpassed the Controls on the posttests. 38 pages including bibliography.

  5. Reading and Learning Disabled Students Improve Reading and Math Through Analytical Skills Training. Fall & Winter, 1992, 17 (3 & 4) 171-223. ERIC Clearinghouse ED 355.806; FLO 021.071

  6. This study explored the use of specialized intensive cognitive skills training for at-risk Title I remedial reading and learning disabled students, who demonstrated gains in both a regular classroom setting and a special reading class setting using videotaped instruction. The gains made on standardized cognitive skills tests generalized to academic achievement test scores in a majority of subjects. More consistent gains were evident in the regular setting where there was inter-class modeling and higher self-esteem dynamics during the training. With time constraints and qualified learning and reading disabled specialist in limited supply, and mainstreaming the norm, technological-oriented instruction can become an increasing valuable vehicle to access and expedite learning for more students.

  7. Retraining Cognitive Abilities: A Report on Thinking and Memory Improvement Combining Suggestopedia with Cognitive Behavior Modification (CBM) for Ages 10-55. Spring, 1989, 14 (1) 3-41. ERIC Clearinghouse ED 333.444; FLO 19243

  8. 1984-1986 Report of 40 Experimentals and 40 Controls cognitive ability improvement for individuals ages 10-55 with The Bridge To Achievement Three-Week (fifteen consecutive days, Mon-Fri, 1 1/2 hrs. daily) small group training. Students representing all performance levels, were placed in groupings of three to five, according to age and pre tested cognitive ability levels. Students included business executives, housewives, general employees (i.e. engineers, architects, clerical, postal) college, high school, junior high, and grade school students down to age 10 (ranging from gifted, high average, average, to Special Needs). A MANCOVA Analyses included a comparison of age, (10 to 15, and 16 to adult) pace, (fast and slow based upon the pretests) and group (Experimentals and Controls). The seven dependent variables were cognitive skills subtests from the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery (1977), and The Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude-1 (Revised in 1985). There was a significant overall main effect for for the group 1 (Experimentals vs. Controls) F=26.55, p<.01. All ages and pace groups made significant gains. 33 pages including bibliography.

  9. Research Report, Part II: Retraining Cognitive Abilities: A Longitudinal Study. Summer, 1989, 14 (2) 113-141. ERIC Clearinghouse ED 333.444; FLO 19243

  10. 1986-1988 Follow-Up Longitudinal Maintenance Report of Above Field Test. Longitudinal data is difficult to obtain. Not only are individuals hard to locate years following a treatment project, but many are unwilling to go through a third testing procedure for scientific purposes. Unless the individual can see pertinent information relevant to their needs, follow-up post-testing can be difficult, if not impossible to accomplish. The number of participants varied from 31 to 40 for the 1- to 3-year post testing follow-up. The research question was: Can specific cognitive abilities be identified, isolated, and retrained, with the results maintaining over a period of time? Specific longitudinal follow-up case studies are documented which include examples of (as qualified by their respective school districts) gifted, high average, low average performing in high school, Learning Disabled (ADHD) and Developmentally Disabled. 24 pages including bibliography.






GO BACK TO HOME PAGE


Jan Kuyper Erland.
Intervention Consultant, Researcher, Writer, Speaker
email: jan@memspan.com
http://www.memspan.com